Obama believes that NAFTA and its potential were oversold to the American people. Obama will work with the leaders of Canada and Mexico to fix NAFTA so that it works for American workers.How is Obama going to succeed only way this works is if countries have an equal monitary system.?
There isn't much of a question here. I think the gist of your comment is that Obama is actually a pro-free enterprise politician who favors MORE open trade and interaction with Mexico and Canada including the creation of a shared monetary system.
There is absolutely no support to that.
Obama has said that he intends to try tweak NAFTA to reduce the economic impact it has had on the Midwest. I have no doubt that is his honest intent and frankly is quite acheivable. How much of an effect will that have on it's own on the midwest --- little to none in the area of job creation.
Now People in Ohio may think that if NAFTA goes away jobs will suddenly come back to Ohio in mass quantities, but the rest of the midwest is a little smarter than that. They realize that NAFTA may have created the issue, but the jobs are gone now--- removing NAFTA won't bring them back. You have to have legislation that pumps tax dollars into the region to assist in the creation of new industries in the Midwest.
Obama is the only remaining candidate who has a serious plan that talks about govenment money (tax breaks, loans) to spur large employers (or create new large employers) back in the midwest.
Obama is not out of the financially imbred big money crowd that Bush, Kerry, and Clinton are/were. He is a midwesterner. He doesn't owe his financial success to the large international corporations that push NAFTA and free trade organizations.
I don't think there is anything to suggest he is anti-free trade, but there is also nothing to suggest he will sell out the American public to get free trade agreements in place like the Bushes and clintons did.
Regarding a shared money, there are financial arguements on both sides, but the problem is Americans would be very resistant to actually using it in the middle of the US. I think it would quickly displace the peso in Mexico though and might work very well in border towns. It might create more problms than it solves.
Anyway, there is no evidence whatsoever that Obama is a closet free-enterprise-at-all-cost advocate (like the bushes and the clintons) who dreams ';unpatriotic'; dreams of replacing the US dollar with a NAFTA enabling, North American Amero.How is Obama going to succeed only way this works is if countries have an equal monitary system.?
HAHA Amero. Another Ron Paul conspiracy junkie. Next you're going to tell me to watch Loose Change and rail against the evils of fiat currency.
Read the link below if you want to learn more about the crazy stuff these jokers believe.
Which is the same thing Hillary says. NAFTA needs fixing because some folks in America are being hurt by it, while others are being helped by it.
Yeah right!
He wants to tape on the weak environmental and labor provisions the dems are calling 'fair trade' and attached to the Peru trade agreement. However, it will remain managed trade shifting wealth from small business and labor to international corporations.
Obama seems to buy into the 'citizen of the world' idea, not US sovereignity, if you look at his plans. they seem to almost look to a federalized planet working through the UN.
So much for our Constitution.
There is ZERO chance of the unifed Americas currency.
Regardless, it's cheaper to make things in Mexico whether you pay them in dollars, pesos or ameros.
No comments:
Post a Comment